MENCARI HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN BAGI ANAK MELALUI DIVERSI

Rr. Putri A. Priamsari

Abstract


According to UNICEF, no less than 4000 Indonesian children are brought  to court every year with reports of relatively minor crimes such as theft, persecution, spreading hoaxes and others. Where children who are faced with the law generally are not accompanied by legal counsel or social services. Indonesia has had a umbrella act in protecting children's welfare, namely Law Number 4 of 1979 concerning Child Welfare which was then followed by Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection which has now been replaced with Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection as implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, New York). Taking into account that the handling of child cases dealing with the law must really guarantee the protection of the best interests of the child and must aim at the creation of Restorative Justice, both for Children and Victims of Children and to create Restorative Justice, before resorting to judicial proceedings at the prosecution level General must strive for Diversion. Provisions regarding this diversion are also regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2014 concerning Diversion. The enactment of the 2014 PERMA is intended so that juvenile justice in Indonesia can be carried out more efficiently, while still considering its welfare.

 


Keywords


Restorative Justice, Children, Diversion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amrullah, M. Arief, Ketentuan dan Mekanisme Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Makalah Disampaikan dalam Seminar Nasional tentang Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility/CSR), Diselenggarakan oleh PUSHAM-UII Yogyakarta bekerjasama dengan Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, University of Oslo, Norway, di Hotel Yogyakarta Plaza, 6-8 Mei 2008, Yogyakarta.

Apong Herlina, et al., Perlindungan Terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum, Manual Pelatihan untuk Polisi, UNICEF-POLRI, 2004, Jakarta.

Barda NawawiArief, Perkembangan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia, Pustaka Magister, 2007, Semarang.

Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, St. Paul Publishing, 2000, Minnesotta.

Dowd, A. Nancy E. (Edited), A New Juvenile Justice System : Total Reform for a Broken System, University Press York, 2015, New York.

Marlina, Perngantar Konsep Diversi dan Restorative Justice dalam Hukum Pidana, Universitas Sumatera Utara Press, 2010, Medan.

Morris, Allison and Gabrielle Maxwelle, Restorative Justice for Juvenile; Coferencing, Mediation & Circle, Hart Publishing, 2001, Oxford-Portland Oregon USA.

Muladi, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995, Semarang.

Robert C. Trajanowicz, et al., Juvenile Deliquency:Concepts and Control, Prentice Hall, 1992 New Jersey.

Soekanto dan H. Abdurrahman, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Rineka Cipta, 2003, Jakarta.

Stickland, Ruth Ann, Restrorative Justice, Peter Lang Publishing, 2004, New York.

Wardaya, Manunggal K. dan Dwi Hapsari Retnaningrum, Diversi Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum, Makalah disampaikan dalam Konferensi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia I Serikat Pengajar Hak Asasi Manusia (SEPAHAM), di Universitas Surabaya (UBAYA), 20-22 September 2011, Surabaya.

Widodo, Prisonisasi Anak: Fenomena dan Penanggulangannya, Aswaja Presindo, 2012, Yogyakarta.

Umbreit, Mark S., and Marilyn Peterson Armour, Restorative Justice and Dialogue: Impact, Opportunities, and Challenges in the Global Community, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, Volume 36 Restorative Justice, 2004, Washington.

Mudzakir, Analisis Restorative Justice: Sejarah, Ruang Lingkup, dan Penerapannya, http://pkbh. uii.ac.id, diakses tanggal 26 April 2014.

Simamora, Janpatar, Efektivitas Penggunaan Diskresi dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Pemerintahan yang Baik, www.akademik.nommensen-id.org, diakses tanggal 25 April 2014.

United Nations, “United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice”, http://www.un.org/documents/ga/ res/40/a40r033.htm, diakses 8 Oktober 2018.

Widodo, Restorative Justice in New Zealand Best Practice, http://www.justice.govt.nz, diakses tanggal 24 April 2014.

Konvensi Hak Anak (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, New York).

UnitedNations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (Beijing Rules).

United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-Custodial Measures 1990 (Tokyo Rules).

United Nations Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency (Riyadh Guidelines).

United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived of Their Liberty (1990).

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1979 tentang Kesejahteraan Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 tahun 1997 tentang Pengadilan Anak.

Keputusan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 1990 pengesahan Konvensi Hak Anak (Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, New York).

Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor : PER-006/A/JA/04/2015 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi Pada Tingkat Penuntutan.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Surat Edaran Jaksa Agung Muda Tindak Pidana Umum Nomor : B-2309/E/EJP/07/2014 tanggal 24 Juli 2014.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30649/phj.v18i2.158

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Perspektif Hukum

The Journal is published by The Faculty of Law - Hang Tuah University

©All right reserved 2016. Perspektif Hukum, ISSN: 1411-9536, e-ISSN: 2460-3406

 

View My Visitor Stats