PENGATURAN HUKUM MENGENAI KEDUDUKAN KEPUTUSAN YANG DIMOHONKAN KEPADA PEJABAT TATA USAHA NEGARA

Yogi Pratama, Muhammad Irsyad Tirtasah, Yarni Nikita Ahmady, Ardoyo Wardhana

Abstract


This research aims to find out two matters. the first matter is to find out how the paradigm of Law Number 5 Year 1986 and Law Number 30 Year 2014 on decisions that are petitioned to State Administrative Officials (hereinafter TUN Officials). Second, to find out the legal implications of the differences in the position of decisions that are applied to TUN Officials based on Law Number 5 Year 1986 and Law Number 30 Year 2014. The following research results, (1) that related to the paradigm of Article 3 of the Law on State Administrative Court and Article 53 of the Government Administration Law, should be related to the type of decision.. (2) The legal implication of the decision’s differences that have been petitioned to TUN officials may allow confusion to occur when it is applied in the process of administering the government and also the process in court.


Keywords


The differences of decisions that are petitioned to TUN Officials.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku :

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Pranada Media Group, Jakarta, 2011.

Philipus M. Hadjon et.al., Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Cetakan ke-9, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2005.

Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Cetakan ke-11, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2014.

Zairin Harahap, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Cetakan ke-8, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2014.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30649/phj.v19i1.197

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Perspektif Hukum

The Journal is published by The Faculty of Law - Hang Tuah University

©All right reserved 2016. Perspektif Hukum, ISSN: 1411-9536, e-ISSN: 2460-3406

 

View My Visitor Stats