Restatement of Negligence in Medical Malpractice

Authors

  • Eko Pujiyono Universitas Hang Tuah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v23i1.171

Keywords:

Restatement, Negligence, Malpractice

Abstract

Research on restatement of negligence in medical malpractice aims to address the issue of uncertainty over legal adjudication in determining the unlawful nature of medical negligence. This research is an effort  to create a clear explanation about the prominent concept of criminal law that are more fairly in the law enforcement of the criminal law code on negligence cases. In addition, this research is expected to create a new approach in the development of legal methods that is a system of assessments and legal discourse by universities, practitioners and other health law observers to get a real and fair result. This research  uses a normative approach and based on conceptual category, regulations, and court decisions. These three elements are reviewed together by considering universal legal principles. A verification  of unlawful nature in medical malpractice has different characteristics rather than the ordinary  crimes proof. The sui generis characteristic in health law has an impact on legal constructions toward negligence cases. A Proving negligence in Health Law requires a medico-legal approach. Legal adjudication of cases of negligence in medical practice in Indonesia requires adjustments to the legal doctrines that apply in the science of health law. This legal doctrine has applied as universal doctrin and be a part of studying to find unlawful aspect in criminal acts relating with the field of health care law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adami Chazawi, Malpraktek Kedokteran, Tinjauan Norma dan Doktrin Hukum, Penerbit Bayumedia, Malang, 2004

Andi Hamzah, Asas Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Rineka Cipta, 2010

Barbara Maier dan warren A Shibles, the Philosophy and Practice of medicine and bioethics, a naturalistic, humanistic approach, 2011

Catherine Tay Swee Kian, Medical Negligence, Times Book International, 2001, Singapore

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Prinsip Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2014

Ewoud Hondius, General Introduction, The Development of Medical Liability, edited by Ewoud Hondius, cambridge University press, volume 3, cambridge, 2010

Hendrojono Soewono, Batas Pertanggugjawaban Hukum Malpraktek Dokter dalam Transaksi Terapeutik,Penerbit Srikandi, 2007

H.J.J Leenen, Pelayanan kesehatan dan hukum ( diterjemahkan oleh PAF Lamintang ), bina cipta , bandung , tahun 1991

Jenny Steele, Legal Theory Today ‘ Risks And Legal Theory’, Hart Publishing, Oxford And Portland Oregon, 2004

J Guwandi, Dokter Dan Hukum, Monella Jakarta, 1984

Lara Khoury, uncertain Causation In Medical Liability, hart publishing, portland, 2006

Leden Marpaung, Asas-Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2005

Moeljatno, Azas hukum pidana, kumpulan kuliah dari prof Mr moeljatno pada Fac HESP Universitas gadjah mada cabang Surabaya 1952/1953

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum Prenada Media, Tahun 2005

Raymond J. Devettere, Practical decision making in health care ethics, cases and concept, third edition Georgetown University press, Washington D.C., 2010

Achmad Busro, Aspek Hukum Persetujuan Tindakan Medis (Inform Consent) Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan, Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Law & Justice Journal, November 2018

Albert Lee, ‘Bolam’ to ‘Montgomery’ is result of evolutionary change of medical practice towards ‘patient-centred care ’, Postgraduated Medical Journal, 27Juli 2016, hal. 46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134368

Charles Lewis, Editorial: Consent to treatment: Supreme Court discards Bolam principle, Medico-Legal Journal 2015, Vol. 83(2) 59–61 ! The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0025817215582167 mlj.sagepub.com

Charles Warren, Volenti Non Fit Injuria In Actions of negligence “ Proper Relations Of The Doctrine , Harvard Law Review , Vol. 8 . no 8, ( mar. 25, 1895 )

Ernest Sengi, Konsep Culpa Dalam Perkara Pidana Suatu Analisis Perbandingan Putusan Nomor 18/Pid.B/2017/PN.TOBELO, Era Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, Volume 17, No. 2, Oktober 2019

Ni Luh Putu Dilvia Mas Manika dan I Made Sarjana, Tanggung Jawab Rumah Sakit Akibat Kelalaian Tenaga Medis Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan, Jurnal Kertha Wicara Vol 11 No. 2 Tahun 2022

Reza Ahda Kadir,Sufirman Rahman,Nur Fadhillah Mappaselleng, Penerapan Doktrin Kelalaian (Criminal Negligence) Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Yang Melibatkan Dokter, Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS), Volume 3 Nomor 4, April 2022 P- ISSN: 2722 -288X, E-ISSN: 2722-7871

Sherel Poluan, Max Sepang, Herlyanty Y. A. Bawole, Pemberlakuan Tindak Pidana Bagi Tenaga Kesehatan Apabila Melakukan Kelalaian Terhadap Penerima Pelayanan Kesehatan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2014 Tentang Tenaga Kesehatan, Lex CrimenVol. X/No. 3/Apr/2021, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/33118/31316

Tisa Windayani, Proporsionalitas Pasal 79 Huruf C Undang-Undang No.29 Tahun 2004 Tentang Praktek Kedokteran Dan Pasal 360 KUHP Dikaitkan Dengan Unsur Kesalahan Terdakwa, Jurnal Panorama Hukum, Vol. 4 No. 2 Desember 2019 ISSN : 2527-6654

Toward a Theory of Legal Naturalism, Randy E. Barnett, 1978 Pergamon Press Ltd.Journal of Legal Studies, v. 2 no.2

Widodo Tresno Novianto, Penafsiran Hukum dalam Menentukan Unsur-Unsur Kelalaian Malpraktek Medik (Medical Malpractice), Yustisia. Vol. 4 No. 2 Mei – Agustus 2015

Zola Agustina, Achmad Hariri, Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Atas Kelalaian Diagnosa Oleh Dokter Hingga Mengakibatkan Kematian Anak Dalam Kandungan, IBLAM Law Review Vol. 2 No. 02 tahun 2022

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

Eko Pujiyono. (2023). Restatement of Negligence in Medical Malpractice. Perspektif Hukum, 23(1), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v23i1.171

Issue

VOLUME 23 ISSUE 1; MEI 2023

Section

Articles

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2023 All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The copyright of each article is retained by the respective author and publishing rights are granted to the Perspektif Hukum journal. This work is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The journals' copyright policy has been revised in Volume 22 Issue 2; November 2022 and the same will be displayed in the full text PDF in the next issues.
 
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
 
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).