Diferensiasi Hukum bagi Penyedia Layanan Over The Top (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dengan Singapura)

Authors

  • Lana Aulia Afiftania Universitas Airlangga
  • Nanik Mahmudah Universitas Airlangga
  • Fauziah Herman Putri Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v21i1.19

Keywords:

over the top, legal differences, Indonesia and Singapore

Abstract

Over the top media service is form of development of internet based technology. Indonesia as an affected country, has not be able to control and manage it. On the other hand, Singapore already has good legal system. The problem is how the differences between Indonesian and Singapore legal system, also how the rule  of law can be applied by Indonesia. This research is normative legal research through conceptual approach and statute approach. Discussion result is the difference of legal system in terms of broadcast content restriction dan the tax collection system. Contrary with Indonesia, Singapore has more spesific content restriction. Tax collection system in Indonesia still experiencing a legal vacuum while Singapore collect taxes through a licence ownership system. That difference can be adopted by Indonesia as basis of payment for provider over the top media service.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Undang – Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 Tentang Penyiaran (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2002 Nomor 139, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Repubik Indonesia Nomor 4252).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 tentang Perubahan Keempat Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 tentang Pajak Penghasilan (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 Nomor 133, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Repubik Indonesia Nomor 4893).

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 33 Tahun 2017 tentang Jenis dan Tarif Atas Jenis Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak Yang Berlaku Pada Lembaga Penyiaran Publik Televisi Republik Indonesia (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2017 Nomor 199, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Repubik Indonesia Nomor 6117).

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019 Nomor 222, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Repubik Indonesia Nomor 6420).

Surat Edaran Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyediaan Layanan Aplikasi Dan/Atau Konten Melalui Internet (Over The Top)

Classification Content Code For Over-The-Top, Video-On-Demand And Niche Services.

Setiadi Alim Lim dan Lilik Indrawati, Perlakuan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Transaksi E-Commerce di Indonesia, Jurnal Bisnis Perspektif, Volume 8, Nomor 1, Januari 2016.

Abdul Salam Taba. (2014). Kontroversi Layanan OTT. https://selular.id/2014/12/kontroversi-layanan-ott/, diakses 20 Desember 2020.

Cisco. (2020). VNI Complete Forecast Highlights. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/vni-forecast.html?dtid=osscdc000283, diakses 14 September 2020.

CNN Indonesia. (2019). Singapura Tarik Pajak Layanan Digital Netflix dkk Awal 2020. http://m.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20191231171852-185-461429/singapura-tarik-pajak-layanan-digital-netfix-dkk-awal-2020, diakses 20 September 2020.

DDTC. (2016). Keluar dari Jerat Tax Treaty Override. https://news.ddtc.co.id/keluar-dari-jerat-tax-treaty-override-6456, diakses 05 Januari 2021.

Fahmi Ahmad Burhan. (2020). Kominfo Blokir Aplikasi Boom Live Karena Konten Bidan Bugil. https://katadata.co.id/desysetyowati/digital/5f47b262c3bd2/kominfo-blokir-aplikasi-boom-live-karena-konten-bidan-bugil, diakses 10 September 2020.

Hukum Online.Com. (2012). OTT Rugikan Operator Telekomunikasi. (2020). https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4f609b640ea25/ott-rugikan-operator-telekomunikasi, diakses 20 Desember 2020.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2020). RCTI dan Inews Gugat Ketentuan UU Penyiaran ke MK. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/press/pdf/press_1275_22.6.20%2039.PUU-XVIII.2020%20UU%20Penyiaran%20%20I%20ASF.pdf, diakses 9 September 2020.

Rehia Sebayang. (2019). Video Penembakan Selandia Baru Ditonton 4.000 Kali. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20190319170329-37-61654/facebook-video-penembakan-selandia-baru-ditonton-4000-kali, diakses 10 September 2020.

Wahyu Budi Santoso. (2020). Tiga Negara yang Sukses Ajukan Aturan Konten Berbasis Internet. https://autotekno.sindonews.com/read/54187/207/tiga-negara-yang-sukses-ajukan-aturan-konten-berbasis-internet-1590926738, diakses 10 September 2020.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-17

How to Cite

Lana Aulia Afiftania, Nanik Mahmudah, & Fauziah Herman Putri. (2021). Diferensiasi Hukum bagi Penyedia Layanan Over The Top (Studi Perbandingan Indonesia dengan Singapura). Perspektif Hukum, 21(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v21i1.19

Issue

VOLUME 21 ISSUE 1; MEI 2021

Section

Technological Issues

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Perspektif Hukum

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The copyright of each article is retained by the respective author and publishing rights are granted to the Perspektif Hukum journal. This work is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The journals' copyright policy has been revised in Volume 22 Issue 2; November 2022 and the same will be displayed in the full text PDF in the next issues.
 
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
 
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).