Plea Bargaining System, Deffered Prosecution Agreement, dan Judicial Scrutiny sebagai Upaya Mengatasi Overkapasitas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i2.273Keywords:
Overcapacity, Criminal Justice System, ReformsAbstract
This paper aims to criticize the criminal justice system that is currently unable to overcome the capacity conditions in correctional institutions. This condition is inseparable from the role and contribution of the criminal justice system itself. The justice system in Indonesia is still oriented towards retaliation against perpetrators so that the imposition of punishment by judges results in prison overcapacity. The results of the study found that Legal Concepts such as Deferred Prosecution Agreements as an alternative out-of-court dispute resolution as a form of contante justitie principle because it only involves prosecutors and defendants where judges act as supervisors. In addition, there is the concept of Plea Bargaining System which is a negotiation between the Public Prosecutor and the Defendant who admits his guilt to alleviate the charges and the judicial process can run more efficiently. Judicial Scrutiny plays a role in overseeing the legal process in coercive measures. These three systems should be implemented in the Indonesian legal system to improve and solve the overcrowding of correctional institutions.
Downloads
References
Eddyono, Supriyadi Widodo, dkk. 2014, Pra Peradilan di Indonesia: Teori, Sejarah, dan Praktiknya, Jakarta: Institute Criminal Justice Reform.
Lovina dan Sustira Dirga, Judicial Scrutiny Melalui Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Dalam RKUHP, Jakarta Selatan, Institute Criminal Justice Reform, 2022.
Mulyana, Asep N, 2019, Deferred Prosecution Agreement in Business Crime, Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
Sprenger, Polly, “Deffered Prosecution Agreement: The Law and Practice of Negotiate Corporate Criminal Penalties”, UK: Sweet & Maxwell.
Ferdian, Ardi, “Konsep Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Dalam Pertanggung-Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa”, Arena Hukum, Vol. 14, No. 3, Desember 2021.
Indra, Mexasai, at all, “Dampak Kelebihan Kapasitas Warga Binaan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Pekanbaru Dikaitkan Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Warga Binaan” JOM Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Vol. III, No. 2, Oktober 2016.
Kurniawan, Kukuh Dwi dkk, “Pemberlakukan Plea Bargaining System Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Untuk Tujuan Menyelesaikan Konflik”, Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020.
Maringka, Rifaldi Jesaya, “Pembentukan Lembaga Hakim Komisaris Dalam Upaya Mereformasi Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Menurut Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 1981”, Jurnal Hukum UNSRAT, Vol. 23, No. 10, Januari 2018.
Motulo, Phileo Hazelya, dkk. “Upaya Paksa Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana”, Lex Administratum, Vol. 8, No. 4, Oktober 2020.
Oded, Sharon, “Deferred Prosecution Agreements: Prosecutorial Balance in Times of Economic Meltdown”, The Journal for Social Justice, Vol 2, No. 1, Oktober 2011.
P.H, Chk Agustinus, “Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan Telaah Konsep RUU Hukum Acara Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum Militer, Vol. 1, No. 1, Mei 2013.
Pratama, Ilham Nur, “Legal Comparison of Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Methods in the USA, UK and Indonesia for Recovering State Financial Losses Due to Corruption Crimes, Corruption Crimes”, Jurnal Corruptio, Vol.4, No. 2, 2023.
Ramadhan, Choky R., “Peningkatan Efisiensi Peradilan Melalui Mekanisme Jalur Khusus dalam RUU KUHAP”, Teropong Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, Agustus 2014.
Reilly, E.g., Peter R., “Justice Deferred Is Justice Denied: We Must End Our Failed Experiment in Deferring Corporate Criminal Prosecutions”, B.Y.U. Law Review, Vol. 2015, No. 2, Maret 2025, hal. 307.
Rizaldi, Rafi, “Over kapasitas Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Cikarang, Faktor Penyebab dan Upaya Penanggulangan Dampak”, Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, Vol. 07, No. 03, 2020.
Santiawan, I Made, “Konsep Deffered Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Vol.9 No. 6, April 2021.
Siregar, Nella Octaviany, “Plea Bargaining dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Beberapa Negara”, Jurnal Wajah Hukum Vol. 3, No. 1, 2019.
Suci, Damil Nugrawan, Siswantari Pratiwi, dan Mardani, “Analisis Yuridis Dampak Overkriminalisasi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Keimigrasian” Yustisi Jurnal Hukum & Hukum Islam, Vol. 10, No. 3, Oktober 2023.
Wahyu, Tristanto, Y, “Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Plea Bargaining Untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi Peradilan Di Indonesia” Jurnal Hukum Islam, Vol 6, No. 2, November 2018.
Ziyad, “Konsep Plea Bargaining Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Merugikan Keuangan Negara”, Badamai Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2018.
Setiawati, Ririn, “Analisis Teoritik Pencerminan Konsep Habeas Corpus Act dalam Regulasi Ketentuan-Ketentuan KUHAP sebagai Implementasi dari Prinsip Negara Hukum (state law) yang Bersifat Universal dan Kaitannya Dengan Upaya Mewujudkan Penegakan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat (due process of law)”, (2010) skripsi, Surakarta Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Dwi, Anugrah, “Plea Bargaining Beserta Jenisnya”, https://pascasarjana.umsu.ac.id/plea-bargaining-beserta-jenisnya/#:~:text=Plea%20bargaining%20memiliki%20beberapa%20keuntungan,kepada%20para%20pihak%20yang%20terlibat, diakses pada 24 Mei 2024.
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, “Judicial Scrutiny melalui Hakim Pemeriksa Pendahuluan dalam RKUHAP”, https://icjr.or.id/judicial-scrutiny-melalui-hakim-pemeriksa-pendahuluan-dalam-rkuhap/, diakses pada 24 Mei 2024.
Lanten, Naufal, “Menkumham Yasonna: Lapas Kapasitas Rata-rata 94 Persen”, Tribun News, 13 April 2023, https://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2023/04/13/menkumham-yasonna-lapas-kita-over-kapasitas-rata-rata-94-persen diakses pada 23 Mei 2024.
Nurhadi, “Magna Charta Sebagai Langkah Awal Terciptanya Hak Asasi Manusia”, https://tekno.tempo.co/read/1472931/magna-carta-sebagai-langkah-awal-terciptanya-hak-asasi-manusia ,diakses pada 5 November 2023.
Pramesti, Tri Jata Ayu, “Arti Ultimum Remedium sebagai Sanksi Pamungkas”, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/arti-ultimum-remedium-sebagai-sanksi-pamungkas-lt53b7be52bcf59/, diakses 24 Mei 2024.
Ricky, Mariyana, “Napi di Indonesia Berdesakan, Lapas & Rutan Over kapasitas hingga 92 Persen”, Solopos News, 14 Juni 2023, https://news.solopos.com/napi-di-indonesia-berdesakan-lapas-rutan-over-kapasitas-hingga-92-persen-1657898 diakses 29 Oktober 2023.
S. J, Berman,. (n.d.), “What Happens in Criminal Court When You Plead Guilty?”, https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/pleading-guilty-what-happens-court.html, diakses pada 20 Oktober 2023.
Serious Fraud Office, “Deferred Prosecution Agreements”, https://www.sfo.gov.uk/publications/guidance-policy-andprotocols/deferred-prosecution-agreements/, diakses pada 25 Maret 2022.
Thea, Ady, “Restorative Justice Sebagai Solusi Over Capacity Lapas”, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/restorative-justice-sebagai-solusi-over-capacity-lapas-lt6360d1027704b/, diakses pada 24 Mei 2024.
Wiryono, Singgih dan Bagus Santosa, “Ditjen PAS: Negara Keluarkan Rp 2 Triliun Setahun untuk Makanan Napi”, Kompas.com, 21 September 2022, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/09/21/15184701/ditjen-pas-negara-keluarkan-rp-2-triliun-setahun-untuk-makanan-napi#:~:text=Anggaran%20tersebut%20sudah%20dihitung%20dan,kita%20itu%20hampir%202%20triliun. diakses pada 10 Oktober 2023.
Yasin, Muhammad, “Dua Syarat yang Harus Dipenuhi Perseroan untuk Penerapan Kondep DPA”, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/dua-syarat-yang-harus-dipenuhi-perseroan-untuk-penerapan-konsep-dpa-lt5e4e775b7dd29/, diakses pada 24 Mei 2024.
Zikry, Ichsan. “Gagasan Plea Bargaining System dalam RKUHAP dan Penerapan di Berbagai Negara”. https://bantuanhukum.or.id/gagasan-plea-bargaining-system-dalam-rkuhap/, diakses pada 19 Oktober 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
