Analysis of the Implementation of E-Litigation with Artificial Intelligence Approach in Procedural Justice and Access to Justice in Pretrial Proceedings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i1.275Keywords:
E-Litigation, Artificial Intelligence, Pretrial proceedingsAbstract
The development of Artificial Intelligence in the current digital era across every sector of society has become a topic of discussion among legal experts for its potential application within the realm of justice systems. Consistency and time efficiency have become key considerations for implementation within the judicial system. Pre-trial proceedings in Indonesia are often seen as a secondary trial process, leading to inconsistencies in time, understanding of legislation, and document management, resulting in disadvantageous situations for the suspects. The integration of Artificial Intelligence in legal proceedings can enhance efficiency, accuracy, and ensure access to justice for suspects within the legal process. In the context of pre-trial proceedings, AI can be utilized to aid in data processing and analysis, decision-making, and monitoring compliance with principles of procedural justice. The research problem in this study revolves around two main questions: First, how does the legitimacy and legal certainty of utilizing electronic media within the Indonesian judicial system stand? Second, how can procedural justice and access to justice be implemented through the utilization of electronic media, particularly artificial intelligence, in pre-trial proceedings? This research is a doctrinal or normative study, relying on secondary data sources consisting of primary legal materials and qualitative data.
Downloads
References
Achmad, Naswar, Maskun Assidiq, Hasbi, Armelia Safira, and Siti Nurhalima Lihat Pasal Pasal 82 ayat (1) huruf c Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)
Heikkinen, Tiia-Helinä. "How does the use of artificial intelligence affect the concept of fair trial?." (2019).
Mukti Fajar ND dan Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2019, hlm. 185.
Paweł Marcin Nowotko. "AI in judicial application of law and the right to a court." Procedia Computer Science 192 (2021): 2220-2228.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Penerbit Kencana, Jakarta, 2005, hlm. 139.
Reiling, A. D. (2020). Courts and artificial intelligence. In IJCA (Vol. 11, p. 1).
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Penerbit PT Rajagrafindo Persada, Depok, 2019, hlm. 14.
A. Mentovich, J. J. Prescott, and O. Rabinovich-Einy, “Legitimacy and online proceedings: Procedural justice, access to justice, and the role of income,” Law & Society Review, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 189–213, 2023. doi:10.1111/lasr.12653
Amarini, Indriati, et al. "Digital transformation: creating an effective and efficient court in Indonesia." Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 31.2 (2023): 266-284.
Bambang Sutiyoso, “MENCARI FORMAT IDEAL KEADILAN PUTUSAN DALAM PERADILAN,” JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUM 17, no. 2 (2010): 217–32, https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss2.art5.
de Vocht, D.L.F. Trials by video link after the pandemic: the pros and cons of the expansion of virtual justice. China-EU Law J 8, 33–44 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12689-022-00095-9
Dovile arysė,., Sarel, R. Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?. Artif Intell Law 32, 117–146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09343-6
Dovile arysė,., Sarel, R. Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?. Artif Intell Law 32, 117–146 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09343-6 . h. 122
Dovilė Barysė and Roee Sarel, “Algorithms in the Court: Does It Matter Which Part of the Judicial Decision-Making Is Automated?,” Artificial Intelligence and Law 32, no. 1 (January 8, 2023): 117–46, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09343-6.
Felicity Bell / Lyria Bennett Moses , AI Decision-Making and the Courts A guide for Judges, Tribunal Members and Court Administrators, Joint research project between the Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration (AIJA) and UNSW Faculty of Law and Justice, through the Allens Hub for Technology Law and Innovation and the Law Society of NSW Future of Law and Innovation in the Profession (FLIP) research stream ,The Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration Incorporated.2022 h.23 , Clinton Castro, Alan Rubel, and Lindsey Schwartz, “Does Predictive Sentencing Make Sense?,” Inquiry, February 2, 2024, 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2024.2309876.
Herbert L. Packer, “Two Models of the Criminal Process,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 113, no. 1 (November 1964): 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/3310562.
Jin, Yaohui and Hao He. “An Artificial-Intelligence-Based Semantic Assist Framework for Judicial Trials.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 7 (2020): 531 - 540. h. 531
Kafara, Safrun. "Analisis Hukum Pelaksanaan Putusan Praperadilan terhadap Perkara Setya Novanto oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Nomor 97/Pid. Prap/2017/PN. Jkt-Sel tanggal 29 September 2017)." Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 1.1 (2020): 81-94. hal. 85
Kamello, Tan, and Marlia Sastro. "The Development of Procedural Law Through the E-Court System After Pandemic in Indonesia." Veteran Law Review 6.SpecialIssues (2023): 15-27.
Lon Luvois Fuller, The Morality of Law (Yale University Press, 1969). lihat juga Stanley Greenstein, “Preserving the Rule of Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (AI),” Artificial Intelligence and Law 30, no. 3 (July 17, 2021): 291–323, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4. Hal.294 lihat juga Hadar Aviram (2011). Packer in Context: Formalism and Fairness in the Due Process Model. , 36(1), 237–261. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01230.x , hal. 255
Lutfia, Vivi. 2022. “Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Peradilan Melalui E-Court Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi Masyarakat Di Era Digitalisasi”. Lex Renaissance 6 (4):677-91. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss4.art3.
Moeliono, Tristam P., and Widati Wulandari. "Asas legalitas dalam hukum acara pidana: Kritikan terhadap putusan MK tentang praperadilan." Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 22.4 (2015): 594-616.
Monika Zalnieriute and Felicity Bell, “Technology and the Judicial Role,” in The Judge, the Judiciary and the Court (Cambridge University Press, 2021), 116–42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108859332.008.
Putra, Dedi. "A modern judicial system in Indonesia: legal breakthrough of e-court and e-legal proceeding." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9.2 (2020): 275-297.
Ran Wang, “Legal Technology in Contemporary USA and China,” Computer Law & Security Review 39 (November 2020): 105459, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105459.
Siregar, Muhammad Yusuf, and Zainal Abidin Pakpahan. "Kewenangan Mengajukan Pra Peradilan Atas Penetapan Tersangka Di Tinjau Dari Segi Hukum." Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 6.2 (2018): 34-54.
Tornado, Anang Sophan. "Praperadilan Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Prinsip Keadilan." Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum 10.2 (2018): 237-252.
Turner, Bryan S (2017). The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory || Procedural Justice. , (), 1–3. doi:10.1002/9781118430873.est0293
Yaohui JIN;Hao HE; (2020). An Artificial-Intelligence-Based Semantic Assist Framework for Judicial Trials . Asian Journal of Law and Society, (), –. doi:10.1017/als.2020.33 h.532
Wang, Nu. ““Black Box Justice”: Robot Judges and AI-based Judgment Processes in China’s Court System.” 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) (2020): 60
Wijaya, Firman. "Pergeseran Paradigma Dalam Praperadilan: Menyongsong Keadilan Prosedural Yang Substantif." Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues 1.1 (2022): 56-70.
Wibowo, Moch Adhitya Rifka, and Sunarto Sunarto. "Analisa Yuridis Peran Pra Peradilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia." Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum 1.1 (2024): 306-320, h. 307
Zalnieriute, Monika and Bell, Felicity, Technology and the Judicial Role (2020). in Gabrielle Appleby and Andrew Lynch (eds), The Judge, the Judiciary and the Court: Individual, Collegial and Institutional Judicial Dynamics in Australia (Cambridge University Press, 2021), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3492868 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3492868
https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/kecerdasan%20buatan
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ai
https://www.oed.com/dictionary/artificial-intelligence_n?tab=meaning_and_use&tl=true#38531565
https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=19186
AI and the Rule of Law: A Dutch Perspective. (2019). The Netherlands Council for the Judiciary.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 102/PUU-XIII/2015,
Tesis, sulijati, Analisis putusan hakim dalam gugatan praperadilan perkara pidana di pengadilan negeri kudus (telaah yuridis mengenai putusan praperadilan dalam perspektif hukum dan kebijakan publik), Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2008, hal.85-86
Mahkamah Agung. (2019). Buku Panduan E-Court, Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI. 6.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Cetak Biru Pembaruan Peradilan 2010-2035, Mahkamah Agung RI, Jakarta, 2010, hlm. iii dan iv.
Reiling, A. D. (2020). Courts and artificial intelligence. In IJCA (Vol. 11, p. 1)
State of Wisconsin v Loomis (2016) 881 N.W.2d 749 (Ann Walsh Bradley J) (‘Loomis’). Cert denied, 137 S Ct 2290 (2017)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
