Advocates and Law Enforcement Officers: Towards Harmonization in the Legal Enforcement Process
Advokat dan Aparat Penegak Hukum: Menuju Harmonisasi dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v25i1.402Keywords:
Law, Protection, Technogy, Media, CommunicatinAbstract
The Advocates are the only law enforcers who can be involved in all law enforcement processes. Advocates can also intersect and conflict with all other law enforcers in the law enforcement process. Therefore, harmonization of advocates with other law enforcers in the law enforcement process is essential. This study aims to determine the urgency of such harmonization and the factors that influence it. This research is a normative juridical research using a statutory and conceptual approach. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through literature study and analyzed qualitatively. This research found that harmonizing advocates and other law enforcers in the law enforcement process is essential because without harmonization, the law enforcement process cannot run well, thus harming the interests of the people involved in the case. Three factors influence the harmonization of advocates with other law enforcers in the law enforcement process: statutory, authority, and interest factors.
Downloads
References
Bungin, Burhan. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Aktualisasi Metodologis ke Arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2017.
Goesniadhie, Kusnu. Harmonisasi Sistem Hukum: Mewujudkan Tata Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Malang: Nasa Media, 2020.
McMahon. Authority and Democracy: A General Theory of Government and Management. Princenton: Princenton University Press, 2017.
Safudin, Endrik. Harmonisasi Hukum dalam Antinomi Hukum: Telaah Kritis atas Penerapannya oleh Mahkamah Agung. Yogyakarta: Q-Media, 2021.
Shadily, Hassan. Ensiklopedi Indonesia. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru, 1983.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Grafindo Persada, 2012.
Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Dasar-Dasar Pembentukannya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1998.
Stout, H.D. De Betekenissen van de Wet: Theoritisch-Kritische Beschouwingen over het Principe van Wetmatigheid van Bestuur. Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1994.
Suhartono. “Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-undangan dalam Pelaksanaan Anggaran Belanja Negara,.” Universitas Indonesia, 2011.
Zamroni, Mohammad, dan M. Tauchid Noor. “Harmonisasi Jaksa dan Advokat dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum.” Surabaya, 2023.
Agustina, Shinta. “Implementasi Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Genarali dalam Sistem Hukum Peradilan Pidana.” MMH 44, no. 4 (2015): 503–10.
Alsyam, Delfina Gusman, dan Didi Nazmi. “Pelaksanaan Peran Kantor Wilayah Kementerian Hukum dan Ham Sumatera Barat Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat Tahun 2019.” UIR Law Review 5, no. 2 (2021).
Bernal, Emmanuel Guillermo Carreño. “Harmonization of cross border contract law: Legal solutions in a globalized world.” Journal of Policy and Society 2, no. 2 (2024): 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59400/jps2273.
Fadhil, Mohammad. “The Harmonization of Wiretapping Regulations in Indonesia: Law Enforcement Perspective.” Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 3, no. 2 (2020): 125–46. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v3i2.75.
Hamdi, M., Gasper Doroh, Moh Ali, dan Indra Rukmono. “The urgency of Harmonization of Central and Regional LawsinthePerspective of Constitutional Law.” Iuridica Pancasila 1, no. 3 (2025): 146–53.
Imron, Ali. “Peran dan Kedudukan Empat Pilar dalam Penegakan Hukum Hakim Jaksa Polisi serta Advocat Dihubungkan dengan Penegakan Hukum pada Kasus Korupsi.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan 6, no. 1 (2016): 83.
Marpaung, Ramsen, dan Tristam Pascal Moeliono. “Perbandingan Hukum antara Prinsip Habeas Corpus dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Inggris dengan Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Wawasan Yuridika 5, no. 2 (2021): 224–48.
Mufti, Erlangga Alif, dan Ontran Sumantri Riyanto. “Peran Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Dalam Upaya Rehabilitasi Narapidana Untuk Mengurangi Tingkat Residivis.” Al-Manhaj Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial 5, no. 2 (2023): 2425–38. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.4026.
Nikhio, Angel, Cindy Sekarwati Amalia, dan Zain Irawan. “Penegakan hukum di Indonesia: Peran Pemerintah dalam Mewujudkannya.” Indigenous Knowledge 2, no. 6 (2023): 414–23.
Novriansyah, dan Syaiful Ahmad Dinar. “Analisis Tugas dan Kewenangan Aparat Penegak Hukum di Indonesia.” Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 1 (2023): 132–39.
Putri, Feby Milenia yahya Krisna, Hary Abdul Hakim, Chrisna Bagus Edhita Praja, dan Gerald Espares. “Thinking the Future Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Law Enforcement.” Perspektif Hukum 24, no. 2 (2024): 269–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i2.319.
Renwick, Alan, dan Ian Swinburn. “Power and Authority.” Hyphen 7, no. 2 (1992): 67–78.
Sihombing, Daniel Romi. “The Indonesian Advocates Association As a Constitutional State Organ.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 11, no. 2 (2024): 315–32.
Sudiarawan, K.A., P.E. Tanaya, dan B. Hermanto. “Discover the Legal Concept in the Sociological Study.” Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 3, no. 1 (2020): 94–108. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/sjijl.v3i1.69.
Supriyadi, Tugimin, Intan ratna Sari, Risma Ayu Sulistyowati, Suci Larosanthy Putri, dan Talitha Fairuz Marsya Nugraha. “Wewenang Polisi Dalam Menagakkan Hukum.” Jurnal Administrasi Negara 2, no. 4 (2024): 204–10.
Widyantari, Padma, dan Adi Sulistiyono. “Pelaksanaan Harmonisasi Rancangan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi (RUU PDP).” Jurnal Privat Law 8, no. 1 (2020): 102.
Yuni, dan Festi. “Perlu Sinergi APH dan Advokat dalam Penegakan Hukum.” Komisi Yudisial, 2023. https://komisiyudisial.go.id/frontend/news_detail/1156/perlu-sinergi-aph-dan-advokat-dalam-penegakan-hukum.
Zamroni, Mohammad. “Penafsiran Kontrak dalam Perspektif Hermeneutik.” Yuridika 31, no. 3 (2016): 521–43.
Dictionary, Merriam-Webster. “Authority.” Merriam-Wesbter, 2023. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/authority.
Dictionary, Oxford English. “Harmonization.” Oxford Dictionaries, 2023. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/harmonization
Nafi, Muchamad. “Cukup Berbelit, Dokter Ayu Akhirnya Bebas.” Tempo.co, 2023. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/552246/cukup-berbelit-dokter-ayu-akhirnya-bebas.
Natalia, Desca Lidya. “Pengacara Juliari Batubara Menilai Vonis Penuh Konflik Kepentingan.” Antaranews.com, 2023. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2345410/pengacara-juliari-batubara-menilai-vonis-penuh-konflik-kepentingan.
Pratiwi, Priska Sari. “Oknum Polisi Diduga Intervensi Perkara, Pengacara Ngamuk Hamburkan Uang Rp. 40 Juta di Polsek Banyuwangi.” Kompas.com, 2023. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2021/11/16/070850678/oknum-polisi-diduga-intervensi-perkara-pengacara-ngamuk-hamburkan-uang-rp.
Sani, Ahmad Faiz Ibnu. “Mahfud MD Beberkan Contoh Perilaku Korup Aparat Penegak Hukum.” Kumparan.com, 2023. https://kumparan.com/irsan-arief/upaya-hukum-kasasi-terhadap-putusan-bebas-pasca-putusan-mahkamah-konstitusi-1wQmFRXFKh7/2.
Sugiyarto. “Dituding Lakukan Malpraktik, Dokter RS Baptis Kediri Dilaporkan ke Polisi.” Tribun News, 2016. https://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2016/01/09/dituding-lakukan-malapraktik-dokter-rs-baptis-kediri-dilaporkan-ke-polisi.
Supendi, Andrian. “Konflik Jaksa dan Pengacara, Ormas ALIBI Angkat Suara.” Cuplik.com, 2023. https://www.cuplik.com/read/17982/Konflik-Jaksa-dan-Pengacara,-Ormas-ALIBI-Angkat-Suara
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
