Keberlakuan Hukum Penodaan Agama di Indonesia Antara Tertib Hukum dan Tantangan Hak Asasi Manusia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v20i1.78Keywords:
desecration, religion, validity, challenge, IndonesiaAbstract
Indonesia with its five pillars of Pancasila binds the State and its citizens to "Believe in Almighty" where the religious identity is the spirit of the State that must be respected. This is proven by the existence of Law No. 1/PNPS/1965 concerning the Prevention of Blasphemy that prohibits blasphemy, atheism, or any belief other than the religious identity recognized by the government and law. Article 156 (a) of the criminal code, known as the Criminal Code, also punishes "the dissemination of information aimed at inciting religious hatred or hostility" for five years in prison. In addition, the Information and Electronic Transaction Law (ITE) Law No. 11 of 2008, regulating criminal sanctions for libel, hate speech, and insulting certain religions/beliefs through electronic devices. On the other hand, the 1945 Constitution, as well as the Human Rights Act of 1999 and Law No. 12/2005 concerning Ratification of the ICCPR guarantees freedom of expression, religion, and belief. Criticism of religion is quite limited and support for atheism is definitely still banned in Indonesia. Therefore, this article yearns to explore the dynamics of law enforcement and defamation in Indonesia in national and international human rights regimes. Then, does the law on blasphemy have a legal basis in the Indonesian legal system, national and international human rights regimes, and the surrounding social values? This study compares the application of religious blasphemy laws in several regions in Indonesia and in several Southeast Asian countries.
Downloads
References
Amnesty International. Mengadili Keyakinan Undang-Undang Penodaan Agama. Inggris: Sekretariat Internasional, 2014.
Andi Hamzah. Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) di dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Christianto, Hwian. Delik Agama : Konsep, Batasan dan Studi Kasus. Malang, Media Nusa Creative, 2018.
Dacey, Austin. The Future of Blasphemy, London, : Continuum International, 2012.
Muhammad Dahri. “Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama Di Indonesia: Tinjauan Pengaturan Perundang-Undangan dan Konsep Hukum Islam”. AT-TAFAHUM: Journal of Islamic Law. Vol.1 No.2, 2017.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Sihombing, Uli Parulian. et.al. Ketidakadilan Dalam Beriman Hasil Monitoring Kasus-Kasus Penodaan Agama Dan Ujaran Kebencian Atas Dasar Agama Di Indonesia. The Indonesian Legal Resources Center, Jakarta, 2012.
Sayyid al-Azhary, Usamah. Islam Radikal; Telaah Kritis Radikalisme Dari Ikhwanul Muslimin hinga ISIS [al- Haqq al-Mubin fi al-Radd ‘ala Man Tala’aba bi al-Din; al-Tayyarat al-Mutatharrifah min al- Ikhwan ila al-Da’isy fi Mizan al-‘Ilm], diterjemahkan oleh M. Hidayatulloh, Abu Dhabi, Dar al-Faqih, 2015, cet.1.
Susetyo, Heru. et.al., Keberlakuan Hukum Penodaan Agama di Indonesia, Laporan Riset PDUPT Kemenristekdikti tahun anggaran 2018. Depok, Badan Penerbit FHUI, 2019.
https://nasional.tempo.co/read/71956 0/ini-10-kota-paling-toleran-versi- setarainstitute/full&view=ok.
https://en.tempo.co/read/874088/maj orblasphemy-cases-in-indonesia. https://www.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/teatrika/ylbhiada32-kasus- penodaan-agama-pada-januari- hingga-mei/3
https://regional.kompas.com/read/20 20/05/07/15314841/viral-3-remaja- pelesetkan-lagu-aisyah-istri- rasulullah-sambil-joget-polisi
https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasio nal/20191212101827-12- 456279/kepolisian-didesak-lekas- usut-laporan-abu-janda-agar-jera https://www.republika.co.id/berita/na sional/daerah/17/12/06/p0jcmk409- hina-islam-donald-bali-divonis-2- tahun-10-bulan-penjara
https://jatim.kemenag.go.id/file/file/p df/edzh1450431972.pdf
https://regional.kompas.com/read/20 12/09/08/10225657/menag.inti.masal ah.sampang.ada.di.rois-tajul.muluk(https://en.tempo.co/read/news/2017/ 05/10/055874088/Major-Blasphemy- Cases-in-Indonesia)
http://www.loc.gov/law/help/blasphe my/blasphemy.pdf.
http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.i d/public/content/persidangan/putusan /putusan_sidang_Putusan%20PUU% 2
http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/trenso sial-38001552,
http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/ baca/lt58a2c0a8bc3ac/vonis-kasus- penodaan-agama-rata-rata-2-tahun tak-jelas.html
http://jimlyschool.com/read/analisis/ 274/mengatur-kebebasan-berserikat- dalam-undangundang/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Perspektif Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.