Problematika Kepatuhan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara dalam Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

Authors

  • Riska Ari Amalia Universitas Mataram
  • Ashari Ashari Universitas Mataram
  • Rachman Maulana Kafrawi Universitas Mataram
  • Agung Setiawan Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i2.278

Keywords:

Disclaimer Clauses, Good Faith Principles, Liabilities, Electronic Contracts, Sales and Purchases

Abstract

The regulation of the execution of State Administrative Court (TUN) decisions in Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 on State Administrative Court does not include a mechanism for executing TUN decisions, which in practice has caused many problems that undermine legal certainty and justice for the public. The focus of the writing is to provide an understanding to the public about the urgency of implementing execution in administrative court decisions. The main issues include two aspects: the obstacles faced by administrative officials in executing administrative court decisions, and solutions to address the compliance problems of administrative officials in executing administrative court decisions. The research method used is a normative research method. The research findings indicate that the obstacles in the implementation of TUN Decisions are due to the non-compliance of TUN officials and the lack of enforcement power for TUN decisions. The solution to address the compliance issues of TUN officials in executing TUN Decisions is to file a maladministration complaint with the Indonesian Ombudsman to exert pressure and revise the PTUN law to provide enforcement measures against the relevant TUN officials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mahadi, Falsafah Hukum: Suatu Pengantar, Alumni, Bandung, 2003.

Maria Farida Indrati. S, Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan, Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 2007.

Widodo Dwi Putro, Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Positivisme Hukum,Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2011.

Adam Setiawan dan Nehru Asyikin, Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Dan Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Dalam Penggunaan Diskresi 73 Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Dan Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Dalam Penggunaan Diskresi Sebagai Instrumen Pelayanan Publik (Public Service), Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Vol. 32, No. 1, Februari 2020.

Al Habsy Ahmad, Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Hukum Eropa Kontinental dan Anglosaxon Dalam Sistem Peradilan di Negara Republik Indonesia, Jurnal Petitum, Vol.9, No.1, April 2021.

Alfonsus Nahak, Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Perspektif Hukum Gustav Radbruch, Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2, No. 3 Juni 2023.

Alifah Putri Nuryasin, Penerapan Asas Praduga Rechmatig Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, ADIL: Jurnal Hukum Vol.13. No.2, Januari 2023.

Alifa Cikal Yuanita, Menelaah Konsep Keadilan Hukum Teori John Rawls dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja secara Sepihak terhadap Pekerja Migran Indonesia di Luar Negeri, J, Vol. 3, No. 2, November 2022.

Basuki Kurniawan, Sholikul Hadi, Kepatuhan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Menjalankan Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Asas-Asas Pemerintahan Yang Baik, IJLIL, Vol.2, No.1, Januari 2020.

Khalid Prawiranegara, Implementasi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Pada Pemerintahan Kabupaten Dompu, Lex Renaissance, Vol. 6, No. 3, September 2021.

Mario Julyano, Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan, Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum, Jurnal Crepido : Jurnal Mengenai Dasar-Dasar Pemikiran Hukum: Filsafat dan Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 1, No.1, Juli 2019.

Muhammad Adiguna Wirasakti, Penjelasan Hukum (Restatement) Konsep Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan Menurut Undang Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan , Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Vol.11, No.1, 2022, hlm.72-73.

Muhammad Rafif, Zakki Adlhiyati, Tinjauan Penerapan E-Court Di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Teori Hukum Lawrence M. Friedman, Jurnal Verstek, Vol.11, No.4, 2023.

Muslimah Hayati, Maladministrasi Dalam Tindakan Pemerintah, Jurnal Wasaka Hukum, Vol. 9 No. 1, Februari 2021.

Reza Tri Wahyuni, Shinta Amelia, dan Tukiman, Peran Ombudsman RI dalam Pencegahan Maladministrasi Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia, Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi dan Politik, Vol.1, No.1, April 2020.

Suparman Marzuki, dalam Vivi Lutfia, Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Peradilan Melalui E-Court Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi Masyarakat Di Era Digitalisasi, Lex Renaissan, Vol. 6, No. 4, Oktober 2021.

Solechan, Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Pelayanan Publik, Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal, Vol. 2 No.3, Agustus, 2019.

https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/12/26/penegakan-hukum-masalahnya-apa/

https://pn-padangsidimpuan.go.id/eksekusi-putusan-incrach#:~:text=Putusan%20condemnatoir%20merupakan% 20putusan %20yang,kalah%20dihukum%20untuk%20melakukan%20sesuatu,

Rohmad Pujiyanto, Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN) Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Hukum, Disertasi Universitas 17 Agustus Semarang, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-08

How to Cite

Amalia, R. A., Ashari, A., Kafrawi, R. M., & Setiawan, A. (2024). Problematika Kepatuhan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara dalam Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Perspektif Hukum, 24(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i2.278

Issue

VOLUME 24 ISSUE 2

Section

Articles

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2024 All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The copyright of each article is retained by the respective author and publishing rights are granted to the Perspektif Hukum journal. This work is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The journals' copyright policy has been revised in Volume 22 Issue 2; November 2022 and the same will be displayed in the full text PDF in the next issues.
 
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
 
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).